Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Polona Hercog vs Mirjam Bjorklund Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hercog vs Bjorklund analysis and find out who is favored!
Polona Hercog vs Mirjam Bjorklund Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hercog 1 - 1 Bjorklund
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hercog has won 44.74% of points on his second serve, while Bjorklund has won 63.01%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hercog, in recent form, has won 52.65% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bjorklund has won 59.74%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.3% and 40.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hercog has saved 57.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bjorklund has saved 55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hercog has won 63.89% of matches played (W/L 46/ 26), with Bjorklund winning 65.22% (W/L 15/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hercog has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 316/ 147), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 111/ 140). Bjorklund has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 16/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Hercog has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 46/ 23), where as Bjorklund has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 73.33% of matches (W/L 11/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Hercog winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Hercog winning 2 and Bjorklund winning 2. The last match between Hercog and Bjorklund was at the W100 Oeiras, 24-04-2024, First, Clay with Polona Hercog getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hercog and Bjorklund have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hercog winning 0 times and Bjorklund 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hercog winning 0, and Bjorklund 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hercog has played against opponents with an average rank of 333.5 while Bjorklund has played against players with an average rank of 178.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hercog has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bjorklund has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hercog has converted 49.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bjorklund has converted 64% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
172
Rank
35
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
271
Rank
123
High
25
Age
Plays
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
58% (471-340)
Career Total W/L
61% (215-136)
63% (20-12)
YTD W/L
60% (3-2)
$2,403,410
Career Prize Money
$378,603
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Polona Hercog | Mirjam Bjorklund |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 13 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:0 | 1:10:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (47/83) | 66% (72/109) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (30/47) | 58% (42/72) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (18/36) | 54% (20/37) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 22% (5/23) | 38% (5/13) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (47/109) | 42% (35/83) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Polona Hercog
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
| 6-0 6-1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Polona Hercog
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Polona Hercog | Mirjam Bjorklund |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 61% (37/24) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.1 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 153.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (119/192) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (70/119) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (46/73) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 64% (16/25) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (93/193) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Polona Hercog Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Polona Hercog
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Polona Hercog
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
48)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Polona Hercog
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Chloe Paquet
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Pia Lovric
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
78%
(
58 of
74)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Nina Potocnik
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Aneta Kladivova
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Polona Hercog
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Lena Papadakis
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mirjam Bjorklund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve %
50%
(
7 of
14)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
40%
(
10 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
25
Total Points Won
14
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
14 of
28)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
39
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Carla Tomai
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
105 of
147)
6
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
0
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
60 of
105)
33%
(
15 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
68 of
147)
122
Total Points Won
123
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Ankita Raina
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Makenna Jones
83%
(
55 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
2
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hercog Vs Bjorklund Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
